Posts Tagged ‘Gnosis’

Freedom, Gnosis and Linkage, Oh My!

No big collection of links today; just a plug for an awesome gnosis-related blog I found, and some commentary.


What happens when a Gnostic “wakes up”? Things can get a little difficult. You see, when you start fighting the chloroform of creation, the universe starts fighting back. The Archons are loosed. Every attempt to break free is met with a brick wall and an Agent in front of it. You simply can’t break free using brute force. Why? Brute force is a physical thing. Try subtlety. Try assimilation. Try persuasion. Because if you keep fighting the physical world you’re going to end up living a miserable life here, and waking up to the truth, however frightening, is not meant to make you miserable. It’s supposed to set you free. Suffering is another prison.

Source: Henosis Decanus: Musings from a Monadic Mind

This is an issue I’ve been wrestling with a lot lately. As usually seems to happen for me, after the revelation comes I end up seeing confirmation of it everywhere I look. This is probably the best summary of this concept that I’ve come across; I read it and went “YES!”

Throughout my life, when faced with an obstacle, my usual approach has been to assess the opposition, gather my willpower and steamroll over it. For an awakening seeker, this approach only ends in frustration (if not injury or trauma)… as I’ve had to learn. The hard way. Repeatedly. Ow.

Every action has a reaction; all acts of force are met with equal opposing force. Like a chinese finger trap, all effort to pull away are just met with increasing resistance. Who’da thought the universe has a lot more force and resources at its disposal than I do. Oops. :P

I’m still in the process of learning how to move and act without force, but it seems a lot of it has to do with the emotional charge underlying our actions. Resolve the internal conflict, which stems from the illusion of need, and there is no external conflict.

The prisoner is held in bondage (no, not the fun kind) by his identity as a “prisoner,” his conflict with his captors, and his idea that he “needs” any change in his available resources or circumstances to be free.

The free and sovereign individual has no conflict and no need of anything — he simply rests securely in his knowledge of who and what he is.

–Palehorse

Popularity: 3% [?]

How Should We Regard the Flesh?


Fear not the flesh nor love it. If you fear it, it will gain mastery over you. If you love it, it will swallow and paralyze you. –Gospel of Philip

The Gnostics are often portrayed as extremists. Not religious extremists as we think of them today, but extreme in how they regarded the body. As the popular conception has it, all groups believed the physical world doesn’t matter, and in their quest to become free of its constraints different groups were led in one of two directions. Some renounced the body and chose a life of rigid asceticism, while others viewed life as a hedonistic free-for-all.

While this may or may not be the case with some groups, I posit that this belief comes partly from the exaggerated claims of their ancient opponents, and partly from projecting common modern views of what it means to be “free.” A fundamentalist of most faiths would tell you that we have to renounce the body and its “carnal urges” in order to earn our freedom. (Yes I know, “salvation by faith alone!” some will exclaim — but in my experience, if you answer “so my actions don’t matter then!” the discussion gets either very quiet, or very loud, but either way a clear and sensible answer is rarely forthcoming.) And then there are the “free spirits” who take the opposite approach, believing that freedom is found in indulgence.

From the quote above we can see that the group who produced the Gospel of Philip (likely the Valentinians) would beg to differ with both parties, instead advocating a philosophy of balance and moderation. When it comes to the question of personal freedom, I have found no better advice than this. I’ll explain.

“Fear not the flesh nor love it.” “Fear” refers to those who renounce the body and the trappings of the material world. “Love” in this instance refers not to a healthy self-love, but rather to identification, and indulgence, possibly to the point of obsession. What happens when we renounce or identify with the body?

“If you fear it, it will gain mastery over you.”

Try an experiment. For the next ten seconds, don’t think about sex. Ready? GO!

What happens the second I tell you to stop thinking about sex? That’s right — your mind goes “sexsexsex!” because the subconscious mind doesn’t register “don’t” and “don’t think about sex” is still a thought about sex. If you were to try this for a day, a week, or longer, suddenly you would find references to sex popping up everywhere you looked; it’d be inescapable! This is because of the basic truth that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. If you push something away by force, it boomerangs back at you with equal force. If you deny part of natural material existence, you put the mind and body, two aspects of yourself, into conflict… and the rejected aspect will simply begin expressing itself some other way, with or without your conscious consent. The Roman Catholic church continues to give us many tragic examples of the “fruits” of denying the body, and freedom has no part in the equation. Many of us have also seen examples of overprotective parents whose kids go absolutely nuts and indulge in all the things they were denied with reckless abandon the minute they leave home. These are all examples of what I call “forbidden fruit syndrome” — the quickest way to create a demand for something is to restrict or forbid it. If you define part of your identity as being against something, that thing is still defining you. It has gained mastery over you.

“If you love it, it will swallow and paralyze you.”

Identifying with and obsessing over the body and the things of this world is the source of much misery, because the only thing about them we can depend on is change. Change is guaranteed, and loss is a certainty; yet fear of change and loss are two of the biggest negative driving forces of this world. Where’s the sense in fearing the inevitable? If we base our identity on anything temporary, our very identity can be stripped from us. Energy we spend on trying to cling to “the way things are” is energy wasted. Our efforts to resist change consume us and cause us to stagnate. Change is like a river that’s going to flow with or without your consent; try to swim against it and you might be able to fight it for a little while. But once your strength runs out, you’re swept along at its mercy; you lose all ability to direct your course and may smash into a rock or two. If you make more efficient use of your energy by treading water and allowing yourself to flow with the current rather than pushing against it, you put yourself in a better position to consciously navigate a smoother path.

How then should we regard the body and the material world?

In between the extremes of renunciation and indulgence lies the narrow, middle path of balance and moderation. We should regard the body and world for what they are — temporary tools that provide us the ability to have experiences and learn a set of lessons about ourselves. That meat-suit you’re wearing is not “you;” it’s an entire collection of organisms that have come together for the purpose of giving you the experience of interaction with the physical world. When is the last time you said thanks? ;) Physical pleasure is neither the ultimate goal nor something to be shunned; it is simply to be experienced, appreciated and learned from. When we can see change as a set of opportunities rather than threats; when we can experience what the physical world has to offer us with honesty and integrity, neither fearing, identifying with or claiming it as a need, we find ourselves on the narrow path. When we find this balance, we move without tension or conflict. When we can move and act out of our own nature and will, without clinging to objects or expectations, we become free.

–Palehorse

If you were helped by this article, please consider making a donation.

Popularity: 3% [?]

God is Not All Powerful


Well, if that title doesn’t get me burned at the stake, I don’t know what will. Nice knowin’ all you fine folks!

In the recent post of musings on reincarnation, I stated that “the divine is persuasive, not coercive.” This understanding was another huge shift in my thinking with major implications. And this is where my inner theology geek comes out to play…

When a lot of people think of “divine power,” the power they’re thinking of is coercive force. I’m bigger than you, so I can exert my will over yours. The old ideas of god/ess/s held that the divine was inherently coercive, and acted unilaterally, smiting the wicked and blessing the righteous as he or she pleased. This paradigm was useful for enforcing a society’s moral code (and more cynically, centralizing power with “God’s chosen mediators” — priesthoods and governments), and interpreting powerful natural phenomena whose true causes weren’t well understood, but it just doesn’t stand up to logic or experience. If God does or can have complete control over any given event, then some of the things that happen on this planet raise some uncomfortable questions about exactly what kind of deity we’re dealing with here. Even more worrying is the fact that people tend to become like the gods they worship, and so many cultures and people have used this idea to force their will on others under the guise of “doing God’s will.”

After much self-reflection, pondering over my experience, the state of the world, what little I know about the nature of reality, I can only conclude that the divine is not all powerful. At least not in the way people think. Control is not power — control is the illusion of power perpetuated by people and entities insecure about their own lack of internal control, and afraid of change. The need for control arises from the fear of loss. If the divine has nothing to lose, then where is the need for control?

I submit that the divine’s power lies in the power of persuasion, not coercion. All control structures eventually fail, because the human spirit (or should I say the divine aspect of human nature?) longs for freedom. But the divine has all of eternity to achieve its end; it doesn’t have to force anything, and if its creation chooses to ignore its influence and destroys itself, it can simply start over. It’s that “still small voice” nudging us toward being our best and doing what we came here for — but it’s not going to force the issue, because love, learning and true self expression can’t be forced — only chosen.

Unfortunately most people are reactionary, and are simply drawn toward whatever is the loudest influence in any given moment, which is usually something offering to take away some of your personal power in exchange for the illusion of security or some temporary comfort. They don’t truly know themselves, let alone express the nature of their souls; they’re told who to be by any number of influences they perceive as having the authority to decide for them. Not that they’ve given the matter enough thought to realize that this is what’s happening. Often it’s only when those illusions are shattered and this course becomes too unbearable to continue, do people start looking for ways to free themselves from the cacophony of competing influences and look for that other, quieter, but infinitely wise Source of guidance and inspiration. It knows what you came here for because it IS the part of you that wants to create, express and become self-aware within its own creation. It will guide you into your soul’s true fulfillment if you would only re-learn how to listen.

For further reading, I would suggest some research into process theology
. I don’t consider myself a process theologian, but it did influence a lot of my thinking, and is where I first came across the idea of divine persuasion vs coercion. The Basic Introduction by C Robert Mesle is a great intro and a pretty short, easy read. :)

–Palehorse

If you were helped by this article, please consider making a donation.

Popularity: 8% [?]

Thoughts on Reincarnation


At a certain point in one’s spiritual development, the seeker usually begins to question the whole incarnative process. Why am I here? Why do we keep incarnating? Who or what makes us keep coming back? Do I have any say in the circumstances I’m born into? Do I have to come back again?

The gist of my thoughts on this as of now is that exercising more control over one’s incarnative experience is simply a matter of realizing that you can.

In the early stages of one’s incarnative cycle, this is pretty much an automatic process. Between lives, the soul is drawn into the first available situation that most closely matches whatever it is reflecting at the time. A single life lesson can be learned in any number of ways, from fun to harsh and even horrific, but unfortunately at this stage what one gets is largely up to the luck of the draw. Lifetimes are spent believing that experience is random; we’re stuck having to make the best of what happens to us, but don’t have much of a say in it.

When the soul begins the awakening process, it reclaims its ability to exercise more control over its experience. At this stage incarnations are planned out more consciously. Many sources refer to the assistance of guides and other entities in this process, though I can’t personally confirm or deny that aspect (yet?). These lifetimes are spent learning how the law of attraction, and other universal laws can be utilized to exercise increasing creative control over one’s experience. It becomes possible to be the teacher and the student, to create one’s own life lessons and then live them, whether between lives or during. In other words, the divine within is beginning to become self-aware, and exercise self expression.

Finally, the soul begins to question the cycle itself, and seeks liberation from having to reincarnate. I’ve been giving this subject a lot of thought — I may or may not want to come back next time around, but either way I want to know that the choice is mine to make. How does one get to this point?

The theme that keeps coming up for me is “personal responsibility.” When we take personal responsibility for all our thoughts, words, actions and experiences (that’s the toughie for most I would imagine), past and future; when we own all our incarnations, we are free to do with them as we will. If that means choosing to come back, or taking our experience somewhere else, then so be it. I don’t believe there is any “higher authority” with the inherent ability to force people to incarnate against their will. My post You Are Your Only Authority should give more insight on that side of it.

Thinking more on this I received this bit of inspiration that I’ve formulated as a logical argument.

Premise 1. There is only ONE power in the universe.
Premise 2. That power is part of me.
Premise 3. Divine power is persuasive, not coercive.
(Conversely: anything in the universe that operates via coercion is not aligned with divine power, and thus has no true authority.)

Conclusion: Nothing is forcing me to reincarnate, and if it has been, it was only because I (probably unknowingly) gave it the power to do so. I will be expanding on these premises more in the next posts.

That said, obviously I haven’t fully figured all this out yet, because I’m still here. At this point I’d like to open the floor to my readers: what do your thoughts and experiences have to say about all this? If your belief system doesn’t include reincarnation, that’s perfectly fine too. I have no interest in “proving” reincarnation; I’m simply speaking from where I’m at in my understanding at this time. :)

–Palehorse

If you were helped by this article, please consider making a donation.

Popularity: 4% [?]

  • Recent Posts

  • Best of Beyond Within

  • Is Suffering Necessary?
  • Three Steps to Clear Negative Emotions
  • Negative Entities and Etheric Implants: An Introduction (series)
  • Energy Cords: Working With Them For Emotional Freedom
  • Overcoming Attention Deficit Disorder: Four Powerful Techniques
  • Negative Entities 101: Introduction and Types of Entities (series)
  • In Defense of the Ego
  • Rethinking Karma
  • The Violet Flame
  • Soul Fragmentation Explained (series)
  • What Can I Do?
  • Conquer Your Fear: Create Your Own Life Lessons
  • Dynamite Your Limitations
  • Creating Your Personal Boundaries
  • 10 Reasons Why I'm Not a Lightworker
  • What Is Gnosticism?
  • A "Create Your Own Reality" Check
  • Love Vs. Control
  • Thoughts on Self Healing
  • Subverting the Archons: Decreasing Resistance on the Path
  • 7 Rules for Attracting Your Ideal Romantic Partner
  • Overcoming Social Anxiety and Public Neg Interference
  • Reverence is Overrated (1 of 2)
  • Your Energy: Valued Treasure or Free Buffet?
  • Love: Here's the Scoop
  • Categories


  • Personal Development Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

  • Archives

  • Theme Tweaker by Unreal